| About Deal Scores |
|
|
|
| Written by Peter Brockmann | |||||||
| Friday, 17 March 2006 | |||||||
|
Based on Brockmann & Company's experience with mergers and acquisitions, we are in a strong position to voice an independent assessment of the impacts of industry impacting events. Here are the dimensions of a deal that we will analyze:
Strategic fit [x/5]. Does the deal really make sense in terms of the strategic impacts it could make on the businesses at hand. Sometimes 1+1 does equal 3, and sometimes 1+1 does equal 1.5. High scores come from combining two incomplete product categories to form a portfolio (a la Excel, Word and PPT into Microsoft Office) or to address a new, high growth market - equipment vendor buys a hosted service provider. Timing [x/5]. Acquisition timing is predicated on the untapped growth potential. However, buying a new company too soon means that the technology is not ripe; it is not customer validated and the risk of failure higher than than desirable. On the other hand, buying a late-stage company, hoping to generate growth from slamming together two big operations means that this ain't a growth plan. Low marks for either of these two extremes. Customer demand [x/5]. Where do customers fit in this project? Are they looking for solutions here? Potential [x/5]. This is really about execution risk. How can it pay off for the participants? Overall score is the sum of Fit, Timing, Customers and Potential. Letter grades are A=80-100, B=60-80, C=50-60, lower than 50 is F.
Only registered users can write comments!
Powered by !JoomlaComment 3.26
3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved." |
|||||||
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|


















